search forgrantsrecipientsfunderspeoplewebsite
researcharound the webhot topicsissuesconservative philanthropyresources

RELATED LINKS

Internal Links

Profiles:

Profile of Person Frank Luntz
Profile of Person Newt Gingrich
American Enterprise Institute
Hoover Institution

External Links

"Gingrich Group" website

"Our Godless Constitution" by Brooke Allen

AEI website

Conservative Political Action Conference website

Gingrich profile at AEI website

Hoover Institution website

Newt.org website

Norman Solomon's: "Gingrich & The Susan Smith Case"

Cursor.org

MediaTransparency.org sponsor

More stories by Bill Berkowitz

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Tom Tancredo's mission

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

Media Transparency writers

Andrew J. Weaver
Andrew J. Weaver &
Nicole Seibert

Andrew J. Weaver, et. al.
Bill Berkowitz
Bryan G. Pfeifer
Dave Johnson
David Domke
David Neiwert
David Rubenstein
Dennis Redovich
Eric Alterman
Jerry Landay
Mark & Louise Zwick
Max Blumenthal
Michael Winship
Phil Wilayto
Rob Levine

Fundometer

Evaluate any page on the World Wide Web against our databases of people, recipients, and funders of the conservative movement.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
February 28, 2005

God, Government and Gingrich

Newt Gingrich is on the Comeback Trail

"You know what that tells you? It [winning the Comeback Player of the Year Award] tells you were terrible the year before."

-- Pitcher Rick Sutcliffe, 1992, the year he won the award.

Newt Gingrich, who is firmly embedded on the New York Times bestseller list with his new book Winning the Future: A 21st Century Contract With America, is both selling books and seeing if people will buy a future for him in electoral politics. Gingrich, the former Speaker of the House and the leader of the 1994 Republican Revolution, was the architect (along with PR man Frank Luntz) of the "Contract With America" -- a document often referred to as the "Contract On America," with its series of slash and burn proposals. Will the American people buy his latest Contract and will it lead to the launch of a full-blown political comeback?

Americans love comebacks; they are as American as apple pie, chow mien, and hip-hop. Movie stars make comebacks -- think John Travolta in Pulp Fiction; books make comebacks -- the novelist Henry Roth wrote Call it Sleep in 1934, but it didn't land on the bestseller list until it was reissued in 1964; and most professional sports give out annual Comeback Player of the Year awards. If a player that may have suffered a season-ending injury or illness the year before or just plain had a lousy year(s), and subsequently manages to recover the magic, then he/she becomes a worthy Comeback Player of the Year candidate.

Political comebacks are a bit harder to find, especially if the politician has been forced to slink off the national stage. Once disgraced, most politicians are grateful to be allowed an easy ride into the sunset, rather than being sent to the slammer. In the twentieth century Richard Nixon perfected the political comeback. If there really were Political Comeback of the Year awards Nixon would have retired them by the time he died in 1994. His first comeback came while serving as vice president under Dwight Eisenhower when he went on television with wife Pat by his side and delivered his now famous/infamous "Checkers" speech, denying that he had abused a secret Republican slush fund.

Nixon's second comeback came years after he dispensed his "You won't have Richard Nixon to kick around anymore" comment at a bitter press conference announcing his retirement from politics after losing the 1962 California gubernatorial race to Pat Brown. Six years later, he was elected president and was handily re-elected in 1972. His final comeback took years to forge: After he was forced to resign the presidency over the Watergate scandal, Nixon spent the rest of his life refashioning his image. At his death he was both a disgraced and dishonored president, and a "statesman" who, as then President Bill Clinton acknowledged at Nixon's funeral, gave him "wise counsel, especially with regard to Russia." Even now, five years into the twenty-first century, Nixon is making a comeback of sorts; a movie titled The Assassination of Richard Nixon is playing at a local Cineplex.

Gingrich: 'I'm glad to be back'

In 1994, in no small part through the resolute work and long-term vision of Newt Gingrich, Republicans took over the US House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years. On February 7, 2005, Gingrich appeared at North Carolina State University where he "shared his vision for the future of health care in North Carolina and across the country," News 14 Carolina reported.

Two weeks later, for the first time in several years, Gingrich appeared at a February 23 breakfast in Chicago sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor. Once a regular at these events, Gingrich opened with the line, "I'm glad to be back." His speech was characterized by the Chicago Sun-Times as "an intellectual and historical romp...a short course on the ills facing the nation and, naturally, the cures."

After talking about God in public life, Gingrich then borrowed a page from the playbook of President Bush, brushing aside charges of past moral lapses as opportunities for personal growth.

Gingrich has been married three times -- most recently to a congressional aide he had an affair with. When asked about his fidelity at the February 23 breakfast in Chicago he readily confessed to being "a sinner."

For Gingrich, "Coming back" doesn't necessarily mean that he actually ever went away. Although he hasn't recently had nearly the presence he had before he quit the House in 1998, for several years he has been a high-profile and partisan analyst for the Fox News Channel and a 'Senior Fellow' at the American Enterprise Institute ( AEI - website).

Judging from the Sun-Times report, Gingrich has chosen a compelling combo to drive his comeback: God and government. Those two topics are much on Gingrich's mind these days; he told the breakfasters that "The fight over whether or not our rights come from our Creator is much more real and much more vivid and has become intense." Gingrich wrote in his new book that "We must re-establish that our rights come from our Creator and that an America that has driven God out of the public arena is an America on the way to decay and defeat."

"I tell you upfront, I'm a sinner; I suspect you are, too," he told the Sun-Times reporter, and then moved on to his scripted message: "Now that we have that out of the way, let's talk about whether as a historian I can talk about how the Declaration of Independence was written, what Thomas Jefferson stands for, and whether it is good for American families to go on a walking tour of Washington to see historically the absolute fact that the Founding Fathers were deeply committed to the idea our rights come from God."

(For a convincing and countervailing opinion see "Our Godless Constitution" by Brooke Allen, who maintains that despite the Bush Administration's insistence that America was founded on Christian principles, America was in reality founded "on Enlightenment ones." "God only entered the picture as a very minor player, and Jesus Christ was conspicuously absent." Not to mention that the word "God" is not mentioned in the US Constitution.)

The Christian Science Monitor's Linda Feldmann and David T. Cook also reported on Gingrich's breakfast appearance: "Listening to Newt Gingrich is still like trying to take a sip out of a fire hose. Make that a fire hose on steroids. Ten years since the insurgent Republican from Georgia became Speaker of the House and six years since he left, he has updated his message of reform -- and with no less of a sense of urgency."

Gingrich also appeared to have some advice for House Majority Leader Tom DeLay: "Republicans in the House have to look at the reality that if we make sense as a party right now it's because we are the reform party, and anything that risks being the reform party is more dangerous for us than it is for the Democrats," Gingrich said. "They should be very careful."

"Talking with Newt Gingrich about ethics may be like talking to Willie Sutton about bank robbery," the Houston Chronicle's Cragg Hines recently wrote in a story headlined "If Newt is warning DeLay about ethics, times are bad." Wrote Hines: "You listen carefully to such an experienced practitioner, but you wonder: If he's so smart why did he get caught so often."

At the recently concluded annual Conservative Political Action Conference (website), Gingrich got his red meat/red state swerve on. He told attendees that as co-chair, along with former U.S. Senate Democrat Leader George Mitchell, of a task force on U.N. reform, he would "bring into the room with me one simple premise...Any organization that permits Sudan to join its human rights commission while investigating genocide in that country is in need of profound and fundamental reform."

Nuggets of Newt

In 1991, the Los Angeles Times reported that Newt told a group of young Republicans to "do things that may be wrong; but do something," explaining that one of the GOP's "great problems" was that "we don't encourage you to be nasty."

In a life filled with outrageous comments and ethically-challenged activities, perhaps the rhetorical topper was the comment he made about the Susan Smith case three days before the polls opened in 1994, equating the murder of children to Democratic values. As reported by the Associated Press, Gingrich said of Smith, the South Carolina woman who drowned her two young sons: "The mother killing her two children in South Carolina vividly reminds every American how sick the society is getting and how much we have to have change. I think people want to change and the only way you get change is to vote Republican (emphasis mine). That's the message for the last three days." (For more on this see Norman Solomon's piece "Gingrich & The Susan Smith Case".)

Newt Gingrich forced House Speaker Jim Wright (D-Texas) to resign. Gingrich engineered the shutdown of the government in 1995. In 1997, he became the first Speaker of the House in U.S. history to be censured and fined for ethical misconduct. A year later he resigned and was going to be replaced by Congressman Bob Livingston (R-La.) but he too was forced to withdraw because of disclosures about an extra-marital affair.

After Gingrich's resignation, he become a fellow at both the American Enterprise Institute and the Hoover Institution (website). In 1999, he founded the Gingrich Group (website), which according to its website is "a communications and consulting firm that specializes in transformational change." In January 2003 the Gingrich Group launched a new project called the "Center for Health Transformation" -- "a collaboration of public and private sector leaders dedicated to the creation of a 21st Century Intelligent Health System in which knowledge saves lives and saves money for every American."

Gingrich's new book posits that if not corrected, five things threaten to destroy the US: Islamic terrorists and rogue dictatorships armed with nuclear or biological weapons; the removal of God from the public square; diminished patriotism and understanding of America's history; economic decline due to inadequate science and math education; and overburdened Medicare and Social Security.

His prescription: simplify the tax code; government investment in science and technology; privatization of Social Security; tort reform; and privatizing as much of the federal government as possible. Gingrich also advocates enhancing America's intelligence capabilities, reforming its election system, developing a more intelligent health care system and balancing the federal budget.

Gingrich's future political possibilities will hinge on more than the proposals in his latest book, his history of ethical lapses, smarmy comments, multiple affairs, and the abandonment of his wife while she had cancer. He did, after all, lead the Republican Revolution. Does he want to be back in the driver's seat? According to The Hill, Gingrich has scheduled "trips to New Hampshire and Iowa this spring, but not necessarily to launch a presidential campaign."

(You can read Gingrich's columns and follow his latest adventures by going direct to newt.org. You can also meet with Gingrich fans and discuss his new book.)

With editorial assistance from Alan Flatt.

Printer friendly

sign in, or register to email stories or comment on them.

divider

 

 

MORE ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Bill Berkowitz
March 16, 2007

PERC receives Templeton Freedom Award for promoting 'enviropreneurs'

Right Wing foundation-funded anti-environmental think tank grabbing a wider audience for 'free market environmentalism'

On the 15th anniversary of Terry Anderson and Donald Leal's book "Free Market Environmentalism" -- the seminal book on the subject -- Anderson, the Executive Director of the Bozeman, Montana-based Property and Environment Research Center (PERC - formerly known as the Political Economy Research Center) spoke in late-January at an event sponsored by Squaw Valley Institute at the Resort at Squaw Creek in California. While it may have been just another opportunity to speak on "free market environmentalism" and not the kickoff of a "victory tour," nevertheless it comes at a time when PERC's ideas are taking root.

In a story written just before Anderson's northern California appearance, Truckee Today's Karen Sloan described PERC as an organization that "contends that private property rights encourage good stewardship of natural resources." The story, headlined "'Enviroprenuer' scholar to speak at Resort at Squaw Creek," pointed out that "PERC scholars argue that government subsidies often degrade the environment, that market incentives can spur individuals to conserve and protect the environment and that polluters should be liable for the harm they cause others."

On its website, PERC -- a non-profit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1980 -- calls itself "the nation's oldest and largest institute dedicated to original research that brings market principles to resolving environmental problems." PERC maintains that it "pioneered the approach known as free market environmentalism."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 10, 2007

Neil Bush of Saudi Arabia

During recent visit, President’s brother describes the country as a 'kind of tribal democracy'

In late February, only a few days after Saudi Arabia beheaded four Sri Lankan robbers and then left their headless bodies on public display in the capital of Riyadh, Neil Bush, for the fourth time in the past six years, showed up for the country's Jeddah Economic Forum. The Guardian reported that Human Rights Watch "said the four men had no lawyers during their trial and sentencing, and were denied other basic legal rights." In an interview with Arab News, the Saudi English language paper, Bush described the country as "a kind of tribal democracy."

Neil Mallon Bush, the son of President George H. W. Bush and the brother of President George W. Bush, attended the forum to renew old family friendships and to drum up a little business for his educational software company. "The Jeddah Economic Forum has been very productive," Bush told Arab News. "I have been to this conference four times since 2002. I have seen it develop from the very beginning. There was less participation in the past, now there is more international participation."

These days, Neil Bush is the chairman and CEO of Ignite Learning, a company devoted to developing technology-assisted curriculum. Ignite calls it COW: "Curriculum on Wheels." In an interview with Arab News' Siraj Wahab, Bush talked enthusiastically about his company's mission: "We are building a model in the United States for developing curriculum that is engaging to grade-school kids, and our model is to deploy this engaging content through a device. So it is easy for any teacher to use our device through projectors and speakers. The curriculum is loaded on the device. We use animation and video and those kinds of things to light up learning in classrooms for kids. It helps teachers connect with their kids. We are planning to develop an Arabic version of that model."

A video on Ignite!'s website makes clear the enervating, rote approach to learning taken by the Bush family. While this may not be an advance in actual education, it does serve to enrich Neil Bush and commodify teachers. In concept it is much like Channel One, whereby Chris Whittle enriched himself forcing millions of primary school students to watch repackaged TV News sandwiched between corporate advertising.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
March 2, 2007

Newt Gingrich's back door to the White House

American Enterprise Institute "Scholar" and former House Speaker blames media for poll showing 64 percent of the American people wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances

Whatever it is that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has come to represent in American politics, the guy is nothing less than fascinating. One day he's espousing populist rhetoric about the need to cut the costs of college tuition and the next day he's talking World War III. One day he's claiming that the "war on terror" may force the abridgement of fundamental first amendment rights and the next he's advancing a twenty-first century version of his Contract with America. At the same time he's publicly proclaiming how "stupid" it is that the race for the presidency has already started you know that he's trying to figure out how to out finesse Rudy, McCain and Romney for the nomination. And last week, when Fox News' Chris Wallace cited a poll showing that 64 percent of the public would never vote for him, he was quick to blame those results on how unfairly he was treated by the mainstream media back in the day.

These days, Gingrich, who is simultaneously a "Senior Fellow" at the American Enterprise Institute and a "Distinguished Visiting Fellow" at the Hoover Institution, is making like your favorite uncle, fronting a YouTube video contest offering "prizes" to whoever creates the best two-minute video on why taxes suck. Although the prizes may not be particularly attractive to the typical YouTuber, nevertheless Gingrich recently launched the "Winning the Future, Goose that laid the Golden Egg, You Tube Contest." According to Newt.org, participants are to "Create a 120 second video explaining why tax increases will hurt the American economy, leading to less revenue for the government, not more. Or in other words, explain why we shouldn't cook the goose that laid the golden eggs (the American economy) by raising taxes."

Although he hasn't formerly announced his candidacy -- and he probably won't anytime soon -- Gingrich definitely has his eyes on the White House. He's just still figuring out how he will get there. Over the past several months Gingrich has been ubiquitous on the media and political scenes.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 25, 2007

American Enterprise Institute takes lead in agitating against Iran

Despite wrongheaded predictions about the war on Iraq, neocons are on the frontlines advocating military conflict with Iran

After doing such a bang up job with their advice and predictions about the outcome of the war on Iraq, would it surprise you to learn that America's neoconservatives are still in business? While at this time we are not yet seeing the same intense neocon invasion of our living rooms -- via cable television's news networks -- that we saw during the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, nevertheless, a host of policy analysts at conservative think tanks -- most notably the American Enterprise Institute -- are being heeded on Iran by those who count - folks inside the Bush Administration.

Long before the Bush Administration began escalating its rhetoric and upping the ante about the supposed "threat" posed to the US by Iran, well-paid inside-the-beltway think tankers were agitating for some kind of action against that country. Some have argued for ratcheting up sanctions and freezing bank accounts, others have advocated increasing financial aid to opposition groups, and still others have argued that a military strike at Iran's nuclear facilities is absolutely essential. For all, the desired end result is regime change in Iran.

If President Bush plunges the U.S. into some kind of military conflict with Iran, you can thank the Washington, D.C.-based American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a key player in the current debate over Iran.

President Bush acknowledged as much when he recently appeared at the AEI for a much-publicized speech on his War on Terror, which focused on the front in Afghanistan.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 18, 2007

After six years, opposition gaining on George W. Bush's Faith Based Initiative

Unmentioned in the president's State of the Union speech, the program nevertheless continues to recruit religious participants and hand out taxpayer money to religious groups

With several domestic policy proposals unceremoniously folded into President Bush's recent State of the Union address, two pretty significant items failed to make the cut. Despite the president's egregiously tardy response to the event itself, it was nevertheless surprising that he didn't even mention Hurricane Katrina: He didn't offer up a progress report, words of hope to the victims, or come up with a proposal for moving the sluggish rebuilding effort forward. There were no "armies of compassion" ready to be unleashed, although it should be said that many in the religious community responded to the disaster much quicker than the Bush Administration. In the State of the Union address, however, there was no "compassionate conservatism" for the victims of Hurricane Katrina.

The other item that didn't get any State of the Union play is a project that was once envisioned to be the centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda: his faith-based initiative. As Joseph Bottum, editor of the conservative publication First Things -- "The Journal of Religion, Culture, and Public Life" -- pointed out, Bush "didn't mention faith-based initiatives, which...[he] once claimed would be his great legacy."

The president's faith-based initiative is facing several tough court battles.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 10, 2007

Frank Luntz calls Republican leadership in Washington 'One giant whining windbag'

On the outs with the GOP, legendary degrader of discourse is moving to California

He doesn't make great art; nothing he does elevates the human spirit; he doesn't illuminate, he bamboozles. He has become expert in subterfuge, hidden meanings, word play and manipulation. Frank Luntz has been so good at what he does that those paying close attention gave it its own name: "Luntzspeak."

In a 10-page addendum to his new book ""Words that Work -- It's Not What You Say Its What People Hear," Luntz, formerly a top political pollster for the Republican Party, may have written so critically of the party's recent efforts that he has become persona non grata. Luntz used to be one of the party's go-to-guys for political guidance and strategy, a counselor to such GOP stalwarts as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former New York City Major Rudy Giuliani and Trent Lott.

"The Republican Party that lost those historic elections was a tired, cranky shell of the articulate reformist, forward-thinking movement that was swept into office in 1994 on a wave of positive change," Luntz wrote. According to syndicated columnist Robert Novak, Luntz went on to say that the Republicans of 2006 "were an ethical morass, more interested in protecting their jobs than protecting the people they served. The 1994 Republicans came to 'revolutionize' Washington. Washington won."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
February 4, 2007

Spooked by MoveOn.org, conservative movement seeks to emulate liberal powerhouse

Fueled with Silicon Valley money, TheVanguard.org will have Richard Poe, former editor of David Horowitz's FrontPage magazine as its editorial and creative director

As Paul Weyrich, a founding father of the modern conservative movement and still a prominent actor in it, likes to say, he learned a great deal about movement building by closely observing what liberals were up to in the late 1960s and early 1970s.

Flash forward some 30-plus years and an Internet entrepreneur believes that it is time for a new conservative movement. He too has seen an entity on the left he admires enough to want to emulate: MoveOn.org.

"The left has been brilliant at leveraging technology," said Rod Martin, founder of TheVanguard.org, "and so have we to a point: our bloggers and news sites are amazing, and the RNC's get-out-the-vote software is unparalleled. But no one on our side has even begun to create anything like MoveOn. And after 2006, if we want to survive, much less build a long-term conservative majority, we better start, and fast."

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 29, 2007

Ward Connerly's anti-affirmative action jihad

Founder and Chair of the American Civil Rights Institute scouting five to nine states for new anti-affirmative action initiatives

Fresh from his most recent victory -- in Michigan this past November -- Ward Connerly, the Black California-based maven of anti-affirmative action initiatives, appears to be preparing to take his jihad on the road. According to a mid-December report in the San Francisco Chronicle, Connerly said that he was "exploring moves into nine other states."

During a mid-December conference call Connerly allowed that he had scheduled visits to Arizona, Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, South Dakota, Wyoming and Utah during the upcoming months to get a handle on how many campaigns he might launch.

"Twenty-three states have systems for putting laws directly before voters in the form of ballot initiatives," the Chronicle pointed out. "Three down and 20 to go," Connerly boasted. "We don't need to do them all, but if we do a significant number, we will have demonstrated that race preferences are antithetical to the popular will of the American people."

"The people of California, Washington and Michigan have shown that institutions that implement these [affirmative action] programs are living on borrowed time," Connerly said.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 25, 2007

Tom Tancredo's mission

The Republican congressman from Colorado will try to woo GOP voters with anti-immigration rhetoric and a boatload of Christian right politics

These days, probably the most recognizable name in anti-immigration politics is Colorado Republican Congressman Tom Tancredo. Over the past year, Tancredo has gone from a little known congressman to a highly visible anti-immigration spokesperson. "Tancredo has thoroughly enmeshed himself in the anti-immigration movement and with the help of CNN talk show host Lou Dobbs, he has been given a national megaphone," Devin Burghart, the program director of the Building Democracy Initiative at the Center for New Community, a Chicago-based civil rights group, told Media Transparency.

Now, Tancredo, who has represented the state's Sixth District since 1999, has joined the long list of candidates contending for the GOP's 2008 presidential nomination. In mid-January Tancredo announced the formation of an exploratory committee -- Tom Tancredo for a Secure America -- the first step to formally declaring his candidacy. While his announcement didn't cause quite the stir as the announcement by Illinois Democratic Senator Barak Obama that he too was forming an exploratory committee, nevertheless Tancredo's move did not go completely unnoticed.

While voters' concerns over the war in Iraq and the GOP's "culture of corruption" predominated in the 2006 midterms, Tancredo will be doing his best to make immigration an issue for the presidential campaign of 2008.

Read the full report >

Bill Berkowitz
January 18, 2007

Institute on Religion and Democracy slams 'Leftist' National Council of Churches

New report from conservative foundation-funded IRD charges the NCC with being a political surrogate for MoveOn.org, People for the American Way and other liberal organizations

If you prefer your religious battles sprinkled with demagoguery, sanctimoniousness, and simplistic attacks, the Institute on Religion and Democracy's (IRD) latest broadside against the National Council of Churches (NCC) certainly fits the bill.

For those who remember a similar IRD-led attack on the World Council of Churches two decades ago the IRD's latest blast appears to be -- to borrow a phrase from New York Yankee great Yogi Berra -- "déjà vu all over again."

The IRD excoriated the World Council of Churches (WCC) for allegedly being tools of the anti-American left over its support of the Nelson Mandela-led African National Congress in South Africa, and its opposition to President Ronald Reagan's contra wars in Central America; wars that destabilized governments and were responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians. And now it is doing a similar job on the NCC.

"The institute, a Washington-based think tank, is allied with conservative groups on issues such as same-sex marriage. From its founding in 1981, its primary effort has been to challenge what it calls the 'leftist' political positions of mainline Protestant denominations, such as the United Methodist Church and the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)," the Washington Post recently reported.

Author and longtime right wing watcher Frederick Clarkson recently described the IRD as an "inside the beltway, neoconservative agency [that] has waged a war of attrition against the historic mainline protestant churches in the U.S."

Read the full report >

View All Original Reseach >